Jude (owner of the Head-Fi.org), did you receive my complaint letter?

 Jude (owner of the Head-Fi.org), did you receive my complaint letter?

A fellow member in Head-Fi.org knew that I sent a complaint letter (via "Contact us") for a recent incident on Head-Fi.org.

He suggested that I can reach out to the onwer of the Head-Fi.org and make him aware of what happened.

He sent me the following information regarding the owner:


I am pretty surprised to find out that the moderator disabled my PM function. As shown below, there is no "Start a Private Message" button for me. I cannot reach Jude. I was able to start PM with a few members before but now I am no longer be able to start any new PM with any member. Thank you, Mr moderator.


Why the moderator is so afarid of me? He did all he can to control my speech. 

I am quite concerned with his mental health. I hope he is ok (as he mentioned that "he is going to be ok (item 5 on the link)", i.e. he is not ok now.
 
Jude, as a owner of Head-Fi.org, you have the solo discretion to decide what you want to do with my complaint. However, I think you should be notified about what happened if you are not informed. It would be very wrong if someone did it intentionaly to prevent me from reaching you. 

Of course, I have no way to find out why the moderator disabled my PM as he never reach out to me via any channel why he deleted my posts, soft-ban me, or disabled my PM function.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"The expert in 'the Monty's video' shows clearly Hi-Res is useless; you won't get stair step audio signal output from CD"....Well, let's check together to find out!

Image
 " The 'Monty's video' shows Hi-Res is useless. The expert said you won't get stair step audio signal ..." I bet the above video , also known as "the Monty's video", is quite famous amongst the supporters who turly believe that " Hi-Res is useless". Whenever these supporters were questioned why "Hi-Res is useless", some of them would just show you that "scientific proof". Some supporter even made another YouTube video to support the very same "scientific" claim based on the same "Monty's video" (as they considered all the things the Monty's video said is factual). The supporter named his video as " Debunking the Digital Audio Myth: The Truth About the 'Stair-Step' Effect " A lot of these supporters may asked, "With so many experts on YouTube demonstrating so clearly with the help of a bunch of   lab equipments and doing various experiments in front of our eyes ,...
Read more

768kHz for digital music sampling? Can you hear 384kHz? You're crazy...

Image
Do I want to hear up to 384kHz? LOL... of course not 😂 768kHz sampling is for something else... ( TL;DR ) The number one mis-understanding of why using Hi-Res music is:       " why we need to to hear frequencies that fall in the ultrasonic range (i.e. higher than 22kHz for most people)???" If you asked similar question or answered someone's question like below, then you are pretty much belong to a group of people who don't know what's Hi-Res music is. Hi-Res music is, in fact, to help your DAC to reconstruct better audio output for the audible range (yes, it is for the frequencies BELOW 22kHz with 768kHz sampling)... (It is a  real dialogue  as I just saw it today in an Audio Science forum) Someone asked: Ma ny DACs descriptions enhance in capital letters 32/768 kHz resolution. Is there any domain when such a resolution may be justified ?   Other (more experienced member) replied: Can you think of a circumstance where you'd even want a dynamic range of ov...
Read more

You should not hear it! It is your brain fooling you!

Image
You should not hear it! It is your brain fooling you! Well... but... but... I really do hear it. This is the following up of the previous blog:  Confirmation bias. Do you have it? My previous blog was based on the following picture (you don't have to read my previous blog before reading this one): If you see 4 boxes with graident of different greyscales in the middle column. Great, you don't have any confirmation bias .  What if I told you that there are something wrong with your vision, as you SHOULD see 4 different static grey color boxes instead of gradients.  The following picture show you the second box is actually a static grey color box (this is the actual capture of the second box in the above picture, you can try to capture it and see for yourself): You may say, " Cool, now, I know I got tricked by my visual perception ".  AFTER  knowing the fact that all the 4 boxes in the middle column of the first picture are indeed just static grey boxes (inste...
Read more