Galileo, Control of Free Speech, and pseudo science in 2024

 Galileo, Control of Free Speech, and pseudo science in 2024

Free speech is an universal right but there are still many places such right is a rarity even in 2024. One of such places is known as "audio science forums".

Do we still remember the story of Galileo? I just saw the following article: Four centuries after Galileo was silenced, UK students are still curbing free speech (theconversation.com)

In the above article, it mentioned "no platform". Galileo faced the "no platform" issue; some students also faced the same issue.

No platform?

Whenever you attempt to speak a truth that is incompatible with the believes of the "audio science community" (aka cult community), you will be bullied and attacked first, then put on control of free speech, and finally be silenced/vanished completely. (I already blogged a lot of my experiences for the last two months. Feel free to check it out as I don't bother to list them one by one here)

It is almost a well-defined path for anyone who does not conform with their cult believes on any related platform

ASR: done (I was banned)

Roon: done (I was banned for a month)

Head-Fi: almost done (I was put under control of free speech)

Yes, Galileo needed a platform he didn't have it. 

Luckily, I still have my blog to act as my platform. 

Control of Free Speech and Pseudo Science

As I mentioned before, whenever someone who has the authority put you on control of free speech or made you silenced / vanished, it is an indication that you did the rigth thing. You probably just hit the nail on the head, especially when you were attempting to debunk pseudo science claims / behaviours.

Don't give up. It just take time and effort to fight for the truth. Let's see how long I can keep on fighting until I use up all my energy.

Appendix:

Even for a simple reply needs "approval". Are we really living in 2024? I can imagine how Galileo suffered at his time. LOL

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"The expert in 'the Monty's video' shows clearly Hi-Res is useless; you won't get stair step audio signal output from CD"....Well, let's check together to find out!

Image
 " The 'Monty's video' shows Hi-Res is useless. The expert said you won't get stair step audio signal ..." I bet the above video , also known as "the Monty's video", is quite famous amongst the supporters who turly believe that " Hi-Res is useless". Whenever these supporters were questioned why "Hi-Res is useless", some of them would just show you that "scientific proof". Some supporter even made another YouTube video to support the very same "scientific" claim based on the same "Monty's video" (as they considered all the things the Monty's video said is factual). The supporter named his video as " Debunking the Digital Audio Myth: The Truth About the 'Stair-Step' Effect " A lot of these supporters may asked, "With so many experts on YouTube demonstrating so clearly with the help of a bunch of   lab equipments and doing various experiments in front of our eyes ,...
Read more

768kHz for digital music sampling? Can you hear 384kHz? You're crazy...

Image
Do I want to hear up to 384kHz? LOL... of course not đŸ˜‚ 768kHz sampling is for something else... ( TL;DR ) The number one mis-understanding of why using Hi-Res music is:       " why we need to to hear frequencies that fall in the ultrasonic range (i.e. higher than 22kHz for most people)???" If you asked similar question or answered someone's question like below, then you are pretty much belong to a group of people who don't know what's Hi-Res music is. Hi-Res music is, in fact, to help your DAC to reconstruct better audio output for the audible range (yes, it is for the frequencies BELOW 22kHz with 768kHz sampling)... (It is a  real dialogue  as I just saw it today in an Audio Science forum) Someone asked: Ma ny DACs descriptions enhance in capital letters 32/768 kHz resolution. Is there any domain when such a resolution may be justified ?   Other (more experienced member) replied: Can you think of a circumstance where you'd even want a dynamic range of ov...
Read more

You should not hear it! It is your brain fooling you!

Image
You should not hear it! It is your brain fooling you! Well... but... but... I really do hear it. This is the following up of the previous blog:  Confirmation bias. Do you have it? My previous blog was based on the following picture (you don't have to read my previous blog before reading this one): If you see 4 boxes with graident of different greyscales in the middle column. Great, you don't have any confirmation bias .  What if I told you that there are something wrong with your vision, as you SHOULD see 4 different static grey color boxes instead of gradients.  The following picture show you the second box is actually a static grey color box (this is the actual capture of the second box in the above picture, you can try to capture it and see for yourself): You may say, " Cool, now, I know I got tricked by my visual perception ".  AFTER  knowing the fact that all the 4 boxes in the middle column of the first picture are indeed just static grey boxes (inste...
Read more